Uncovering the Nuances of Two Societal Labelings
As a man living in the 21st Century, it’s becoming increasingly important to understand the implications of the terms ‘soy boy’ and ‘simp man’, two labelings that have recently made their way into the public sphere. But what do these terms mean, where do they come from, and what implications do they have?
The terms ‘soy boy’ and ‘simp man’ first entered public discourse in the early 2010s. At their core, both terms are derogatory descriptors of men, typically intended to imply that they are weak, submissive, and effeminate. The term ‘soy boy’ in particular is rooted in racism, as it originated in the early 2010s as an anti-Asian slur. The ‘soy’ part is a reference to soy sauce, a condiment that is commonly used in East Asian cuisine, while ‘boy’ implies a lack of maturity or strength.
The term ‘simp man’, on the other hand, is rooted in sexism. It seeks to deride men who are overly devoted to, or in service of, women, suggesting that these men are blindly subservient and fail to recognize the objectification of women that such a relationship implies. Simp man implies a level of weakness, in which a man gives up his power to women, thereby forfeiting his strength and masculinity.
At the same time, neither term stands in isolation; both are associated with the idea of toxic masculinity, which views traditional gender roles and attributes as the only acceptable way for men to behave. This is a damaging idea, as it suggests that any behavior outside of the narrow gender boundaries of ‘masculinity’ is unacceptable and leads to some form of ‘weakness’.
Interestingly, however, it is worth mentioning that these terms are not always used in a negative way. While they certainly can be used to shame men into submission, they can also be used to highlight the absurdity of traditional gender roles and expectations in modern society. For instance, the term ‘simp man’ can be used to lampoon men who put themselves in subservient positions in order to win the approval of women or to gain social status. In this way, the term can be used to challenge the idea of toxic masculinity.
Ultimately, the terms ‘soy boy’ and ‘simp man’ have emerged in recent years as socially charged labels with both negative and positive implications. While they can be used to further the idea of toxic masculinity and enforce outdated gender roles, they can also be used to challenge these ideas and highlight their absurdity. As men living in the 21st Century, it’s important for us to recognize the nuanced uses of these terms, and to use them responsibly.